Defining high risk of osteoporotic fracture: a cross talk between clinical experience and guidelines recommendations.

BACKGROUND

: There is no universally accepted definition for patients at high risk of osteoporotic fracture.

OBJECTIVES

: This study aimed to survey Spanish rheumatologists; to obtain opinions about risk factors, and an acceptable definition for patients at high risk of osteoporotic fracture; and to compare daily practice patterns with current osteoporosis guidelines.

METHODS

: A total of 174 rheumatologists from throughout Spain completed an online survey about various risk factors for fragility fracture and about the management of patients with osteoporosis in clinical practice. Results were reviewed by a coordinating committee of osteoporosis experts and were compared with published national and international guideline recommendations.

RESULTS

: Almost all rheumatologists who completed the survey (99%) consider that a group of patients exists with a high risk of osteoporotic fracture and that this group should be managed appropriately. Previous fracture is considered the most important risk factor, particularly in cases of multiple fracture, severe vertebral fracture, hip fracture, or fracture despite osteoporosis treatment. However, in osteoporosis guidelines, age, bone mineral density, and previous fragility fracture are the most important risk factors for new fracture. Furthermore, Spanish rheumatologists tend to treat patients at high risk of fracture with anabolic therapy (e.g., teriparatide), whereas guidelines make no such recommendation.

CONCLUSIONS

: In osteoporosis, a large gap exists between implementation of guideline recommendations and actual clinical practice; this may be due, in part, to heterogeneity among existing guidelines. Thus, inclusion in guidelines of a practical definition of high risk of osteoporotic fracture may provide significant opportunities to improve patient care and prevent future fragility fractures.