European review of aging and physical activity : official journal of the European Group for Research into Elderly and Physical Activity · 2024
Reliable measures of rest-activity rhythm fragmentation: how many days are needed?
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Danilevicz Ian Meneghel, Vidil Sam, Landré Benjamin, Dugravot Aline, van Hees Vincent Theodor, Sabia Séverine
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: A more fragmented, less stable rest-activity rhythm (RAR) is emerging as a risk factor for health. Accelerometer devices are increasingly used to measure RAR fragmentation using metrics such as inter-daily stability (IS), intradaily variability (IV), transition probabilities (TP), self-similarity parameter (α), and activity balance index (ABI). These metrics were proposed in the context of long period of wear but, in real life, non-wear might introduce measurement bias. This study aims to determine the minimum number of valid days to obtain reliable fragmentation metrics.
METHODS: Wrist-worn accelerometer data were drawn from the Whitehall accelerometer sub-study (age: 60 to 83 years) to simulate different non-wear patterns. Pseudo-simulated data with different numbers of valid days (one to seven), defined as < 1/3 of non-wear during both day and night periods, and with omission or imputation of non-wear periods were compared against complete data using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and mean absolute percent error (MAPE).
RESULTS: Five days with valid data (97.8% of participants) and omission of non-wear periods allowed an ICC ≥ 0.75 and MAPE ≤ 15%, acceptable cut points for reliability, for IS and ABI; this number was lower for TPs (two-three days), α and IV (four days). Overall, imputation of data did not provide better estimates. Findings were consistent across age and sex groups.
CONCLUSIONS: The number of days of wrist accelerometer data with at least 2/3 of wear time for both day and night periods varies from two (TPs) to five (IS, ABI) days for reliable RAR measures among older adults.
METHODS: Wrist-worn accelerometer data were drawn from the Whitehall accelerometer sub-study (age: 60 to 83 years) to simulate different non-wear patterns. Pseudo-simulated data with different numbers of valid days (one to seven), defined as < 1/3 of non-wear during both day and night periods, and with omission or imputation of non-wear periods were compared against complete data using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and mean absolute percent error (MAPE).
RESULTS: Five days with valid data (97.8% of participants) and omission of non-wear periods allowed an ICC ≥ 0.75 and MAPE ≤ 15%, acceptable cut points for reliability, for IS and ABI; this number was lower for TPs (two-three days), α and IV (four days). Overall, imputation of data did not provide better estimates. Findings were consistent across age and sex groups.
CONCLUSIONS: The number of days of wrist accelerometer data with at least 2/3 of wear time for both day and night periods varies from two (TPs) to five (IS, ABI) days for reliable RAR measures among older adults.