MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.amjopharm.2011.02.009

Медицинская библиотека · The American journal of geriatric pharmacotherapy · 2011

Bisphosphonate-related subtrochanteric femoral fractures.

Gunawardena Indunil, Baxter Mark, Rasekh Yama

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Hip fractures are important because they are associated with an increased rate of death, substantial morbidity, enormous costs, and devastating effects on independence and quality of life. Bisphosphonates have proven efficacy in reducing the incidence of spine and nonspine fractures. Several case series and multiple individual case reports from around the world suggest that some subtrochanteric fractures and those of the femoral shaft might occur in patients who have been treated with long-term bisphosphonate therapy.

CASE SUMMARY: We present a case in the United Kingdom, where a patient presented with bilateral, sequential bisphosphonate-related subtrochanteric fractures. Several unique clinical and radiographic features surrounding these atypical fractures that have been identified in the literature are illustrated in this case.

CONCLUSIONS

There is no rationale for withholding bisphosphonate therapy from patients with osteoporosis, although continued use of bisphosphonates beyond a treatment period of 3 to 5 years should be reevaluated annually. In patients who have been on long-term bisphosphonate therapy, physicians should specifically solicit information of unique clinical features and consider imaging, when appropriate.

Для цитирования: Gunawardena Indunil, Baxter Mark, Rasekh Yama. Bisphosphonate-related subtrochanteric femoral fractures.. The American journal of geriatric pharmacotherapy. 2011. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjopharm.2011.02.009.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.