The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2013
Clinical review: Anogenital distance or digit length ratio as measures of fetal androgen exposure: relationship to male reproductive development and its disorders.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАОбзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Dean Afshan, Sharpe Richard M
Аннотация
CONTEXT: Male reproductive disorders evident at birth or in young adulthood are remarkably common. They are hypothesized to comprise a testicular dysgenesis syndrome (TDS), with a fetal origin involving mild androgen deficiency.
EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: Testing this hypothesis requires "seeing back in time." Two ways have been proposed: measurement of anogenital distance (AGD), or measurement of the 2:4 digit length ratio. This review assesses the evidence that they reflect fetal androgen exposure and might be used to provide insight into the origin of TDS disorders.
EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Supporting evidence for AGD derives from rat experimental studies that identified a fetal masculinization programming window, within which androgen action determines adult reproductive organ size, TDS disorders, and AGD. In humans, AGD is positively correlated to testis size, sperm count/fertility, penis length, and T levels, consistent with rat experimental data. The 2:4 digit ratio also shows associations with these parameters, but inconsistently between studies; evidence that the 2:4 digit ratio accurately reflects fetal androgen exposure is also equivocal.
CONCLUSIONS: AGD appears to provide a reliable guide to fetal androgen exposure, although available data are limited. The next steps are to: standardize AGD measurement; obtain age-specific population data; and use AGD to evaluate the importance of fetal androgens in determining reproductive disorders and variation in testis/penis size and sperm count in the normal population. These studies should identify what, if any, clinical applications of AGD measurement are feasible--for example, its ability to predict adult-onset reproductive function and disorders.
EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: Testing this hypothesis requires "seeing back in time." Two ways have been proposed: measurement of anogenital distance (AGD), or measurement of the 2:4 digit length ratio. This review assesses the evidence that they reflect fetal androgen exposure and might be used to provide insight into the origin of TDS disorders.
EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Supporting evidence for AGD derives from rat experimental studies that identified a fetal masculinization programming window, within which androgen action determines adult reproductive organ size, TDS disorders, and AGD. In humans, AGD is positively correlated to testis size, sperm count/fertility, penis length, and T levels, consistent with rat experimental data. The 2:4 digit ratio also shows associations with these parameters, but inconsistently between studies; evidence that the 2:4 digit ratio accurately reflects fetal androgen exposure is also equivocal.
CONCLUSIONS: AGD appears to provide a reliable guide to fetal androgen exposure, although available data are limited. The next steps are to: standardize AGD measurement; obtain age-specific population data; and use AGD to evaluate the importance of fetal androgens in determining reproductive disorders and variation in testis/penis size and sperm count in the normal population. These studies should identify what, if any, clinical applications of AGD measurement are feasible--for example, its ability to predict adult-onset reproductive function and disorders.