MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/1071100717698695

Медицинская библиотека · Foot & ankle international · 2017

Long-term Results of Scandinavian Total Ankle Replacement.

Koivu Helka, Kohonen Ia, Mattila Kimmo, Loyttyniemi Eliisa, Tiusanen Hannu

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-term results of the Scandinavian Total Ankle Replacement (STAR) implant in a single center.

METHODS

Between 1997 and 2002, 34 consecutive ankles were replaced with the STAR ankle prosthesis and reviewed in 2016. Patients were followed both radiologically and clinically; clinical outcomes were measured with the Kofoed ankle score and subjective measurements. The median follow-up period was 159 months (13.3 years; range, 13-202 months).

RESULTS

The implant survival rate was 93.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 92.2%-86.7%) at 5 years, 86.7% (95% CI, 69.3%-96.2%) at 10 years, and 63.6% (95% CI, 30.8%-89.0%) at 15 years. A total of 15 ankles (44%) had been revised: 2 by fusion, 3 by further replacement, 5 by insert exchange, and 5 by bone grafting for marked osteolysis. The improvements in the Kofoed ankle score and Kofoed ankle score for pain were statistically significant at every postoperative evaluation point compared to the preoperative values (all P < .0001), and subjective patient satisfaction was high.

CONCLUSION

Our results were satisfactory and in agreement with previously reported findings of STAR implants.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, retrospective case series.

Для цитирования: Koivu Helka, Kohonen Ia, Mattila Kimmo, Loyttyniemi Eliisa, Tiusanen Hannu. Long-term Results of Scandinavian Total Ankle Replacement.. Foot & ankle international. 2017. DOI: 10.1177/1071100717698695.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.