The New Zealand medical journal · 2002
Could laboratory-based notification improve the control of foodborne illness in New Zealand?
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Simmons Greg, Whittaker Robyn, Boyle Kerry, Morris Arthur J, Upton Arlo, Calder Lester
Аннотация
AIMS: To estimate the completeness and timeliness of notifications of seven potentially foodborne diseases in Auckland.
METHODS: The diseases audited were shigellosis, salmonellosis, campylobacteriosis, yersiniosis, listeriosis, hepatitis A and verocytotoxigenic (VTEC) E. coli infections. Hospital and community laboratory-confirmed cases for the calendar year 2000 were audited against those notified to the Auckland Regional Public Health Service. Cases were matched on disease, name, date of birth, gender and National Health Index number.
RESULTS: There were 3182 laboratory-confirmed cases of the seven diseases identified of which 77% had been notified to the Auckland Regional Public Health Service. The proportion of laboratory-confirmed cases notified ranged from a 65% for hepatitis A to 100% for VTEC infection. The median delay between laboratory confirmation and practitioner notification was two days. Notification of all laboratory-confirmed cases would have resulted in an estimated 145 additional investigations in the year 2000.
CONCLUSION: A change to laboratory-based notification could improve public health investigation and control of foodborne disease in New Zealand.
METHODS: The diseases audited were shigellosis, salmonellosis, campylobacteriosis, yersiniosis, listeriosis, hepatitis A and verocytotoxigenic (VTEC) E. coli infections. Hospital and community laboratory-confirmed cases for the calendar year 2000 were audited against those notified to the Auckland Regional Public Health Service. Cases were matched on disease, name, date of birth, gender and National Health Index number.
RESULTS: There were 3182 laboratory-confirmed cases of the seven diseases identified of which 77% had been notified to the Auckland Regional Public Health Service. The proportion of laboratory-confirmed cases notified ranged from a 65% for hepatitis A to 100% for VTEC infection. The median delay between laboratory confirmation and practitioner notification was two days. Notification of all laboratory-confirmed cases would have resulted in an estimated 145 additional investigations in the year 2000.
CONCLUSION: A change to laboratory-based notification could improve public health investigation and control of foodborne disease in New Zealand.