MedElevator
Войти в исследования BMC pediatrics · 2013
Epidemiology of isolated preaxial polydactyly type I: data from the Polish Registry of Congenital Malformations (PRCM).
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Materna-Kiryluk Anna, Jamsheer Aleksander, Wisniewska Katarzyna, Wieckowska Barbara, Limon Janusz, Borszewska-Kornacka Maria, Sawulicka-Oleszczuk Henryka, Szwalkiewicz-Warowicka Ewa, Latos-Bielenska Anna
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Polydactyly represents a heterogeneous group of congenital hand and foot anomalies with variable clinical features and diverse etiology. Preaxial polydactyly type I (PPD1) is the most frequent form of preaxial polydactyly. The etiology of sporadic PPD1 remains largely unknown and the relative contribution of genetic and environmental factors is not clearly defined. The primary goals of this study are twofold: (1) to examine the epidemiology and clinical features of sporadic PPD1 in comparison to a healthy control group, and (2) to contrast the characteristics of sporadic PPD1 with familial forms of isolated polydactyly.
METHODS: Among 2,530,349 live births registered in the Polish Registry of Congenital Malformations (PRCM), we identified 459 children with isolated sporadic PPD1 and 353 children with familial polydactyly, including 57 children with familial PPD1.
RESULTS: In comparison with the matched group of 303 controls, sporadic PPD1 cases had significantly lower birth order (P = 0.01) and birthweight (P < 0.0001). Similarly, when compared to familial cases of polydactyly, lower birth order (P = 0.047) and lower birthweight (P < 0.0001) were characteristic of sporadic PPD1 cases. Moreover, our analyses suggested several additional risk factors for sporadic PPD1, including lower paternal education levels (P = 0.01), upper respiratory tract infections during the first trimester of pregnancy (P = 0.049), and maternal history of epilepsy (P = 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: In summary, our study provides support to the hypothesis that non-genetic factors play an important role in the etiology of non-familiar PPD1.
METHODS: Among 2,530,349 live births registered in the Polish Registry of Congenital Malformations (PRCM), we identified 459 children with isolated sporadic PPD1 and 353 children with familial polydactyly, including 57 children with familial PPD1.
RESULTS: In comparison with the matched group of 303 controls, sporadic PPD1 cases had significantly lower birth order (P = 0.01) and birthweight (P < 0.0001). Similarly, when compared to familial cases of polydactyly, lower birth order (P = 0.047) and lower birthweight (P < 0.0001) were characteristic of sporadic PPD1 cases. Moreover, our analyses suggested several additional risk factors for sporadic PPD1, including lower paternal education levels (P = 0.01), upper respiratory tract infections during the first trimester of pregnancy (P = 0.049), and maternal history of epilepsy (P = 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: In summary, our study provides support to the hypothesis that non-genetic factors play an important role in the etiology of non-familiar PPD1.