Autoantibody profile in a cohort of Algerian patients with systemic sclerosis.
Аннотация
AIM: To describe the autoantibody profile in a cohort of Algerian patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) and to determine clinical associations between SSc-related autoantibodies, disease subtypes and specific clinical features.
METHODS
Consecutive Algerian patients with SSc were included in the present study. In addition to clinical characterization, all subjects underwent autoantibody testing using indirect immunofluorescence, immunoenzymatic, and line immunoblot assays.
RESULTS
A total of 150 patients were included in this study, 103 (68.7%) had limited cutaneous SSc (lcSSc), 42 (28%) had diffuse cutaneous SSc (dcSSc) and 5 (3.3%) had sine cutaneous scleroderma. One hundred thirty-five (90.0%) patients were positive for SSc-related autoantibodies, including 63 (42%) with more than one autoantibody. The two most frequent autoantibodies were anti-topoisomerase I (ATA) (76; 50.7%) and anti-SSA/Ro (49; 32.7%). Only 23 (15.3%) patients were positive for anticentromere; 9 (6%) were positive for anti RNA polymerase III; 5 (3.3%) for anti-U3 RNP; 3 (2%) for anti Th/To; 25 (16.7%) for anti-U1 RNP; 11 (7.3%) for anti-PM/Scl and 4 (2.7%) for anti-Ku. Anti-topoisomerase I was associated with dcSSc (p <0.0001), interstitial lung disease (ILD) (p <0.0001) and digital ulcers (p <0.0001). Anti-U3 RNP was associated with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) (p=0.031).
CONCLUSION
Notable similarities and differences in the prevalence of SSc-related autoantibodies were found in our population when compared to other ethnic groups. ATA and anti-U3 RNP may be a reliable biomarker for ILD and PAH. Further studies should be conducted to better understand the ethnic influence on disease expression and autoantibody production.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.