MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1093/rheumatology/keaf205

Медицинская библиотека · Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2025

Implementation outcomes of a patient decision-aid in a diverse population with systemic lupus erythematosus in 15 US rheumatology clinics.

Singh Jasvinder A, Hearld Larry R, Eisen Seth, Chatham W Winn, Narain Sonali, Annapureddy Narender, Kamen Diane L, Trotter Kimberly, Majithia Vikas, Lee Ching Cathy, Aouhab Zineb, Venuturupalli Swamy, Wallace Daniel J, Ramsey-Goldman Rosalind, Kim Alfred, McMahon Maureen, Sam Lim S, Bhairavarasu Kalpana, Meara Alexa, Kalunian Kenneth, Beasley T Mark, Implementing DEcision-Aid for Lupus in clinics (IDEAL) Consortium

СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to examine the clinical outcomes during the implementation of a self-administered patient decision-aid (PtDA) for lupus.

METHODS

We provided an effective computerized lupus PtDA in 15 rheumatology outpatient clinics 2019-2024 (including the COVID pandemic). We undertook Organizational Readiness to Implement Change Surveys (ORICs) and Team Learning and Psychological Safety Surveys (TLPSSs) at baseline. The primary study outcome objective measure, percent penetration/reach, was defined as the number of patients who viewed the lupus PtDA at the end of the study, divided by the total number of eligible patients (times 100). We used validated clinical personnel surveys to examine the perceived lupus PtDA appropriateness, acceptability, feasibility, success, and permanence, at 4 months, 12 months and 24 months post-PtDA implementation.

RESULTS

Among the sites, the clinical personnels' (n = 184) baseline ORIC commitment and efficacy scores (a 0-5 scale, higher = better) ranged from 3.5 to 4.2, and 3.4 to 4.4, respectively; the TLPSS scores (a 0-7 scale, higher = better) were 3.9-5.5 for internal learning, 3.7-5.6 for external learning, and 4.3-5.5 for psychological safety. The penetration (primary outcome) among 15 geographically diverse US rheumatology clinics ranged from 3% to 44%. We found that the total number of providers in the clinic was positively associated with higher penetration. Clinical personnel-perceived lupus PtDA outcomes were optimal at 4 months (all scale scores ranged from 1 to 5, higher = better): (i) appropriateness, 3.43 (s.d. 0.86); (ii) acceptability, 3.53 (s.d. 0.83); (iii) feasibility, 3.44 (s.d. 0.71); (iv) success, 3.41 (s.d. 0.73); and (v) permanence, 3.22 (s.d. 0.74).

CONCLUSION

We implemented a lupus PtDA with varied success rates during the COVID pandemic; more providers were associated with higher clinic penetration. Clinical personnel perceived high lupus PtDA appropriateness, acceptability, feasibility, success, and permanence that persisted up to 24 months.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, http://clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03735238.

Для цитирования: Singh Jasvinder A, Hearld Larry R, Eisen Seth, Chatham W Winn, Narain Sonali, Annapureddy Narender, Kamen Diane L, Trotter Kimberly, Majithia Vikas, Lee Ching Cathy, Aouhab Zineb, Venuturupalli Swamy, Wallace Daniel J, Ramsey-Goldman Rosalind, Kim Alfred, McMahon Maureen, Sam Lim S, Bhairavarasu Kalpana, Meara Alexa, Kalunian Kenneth, Beasley T Mark, Implementing DEcision-Aid for Lupus in clinics (IDEAL) Consortium. Implementation outcomes of a patient decision-aid in a diverse population with systemic lupus erythematosus in 15 US rheumatology clinics.. Rheumatology (Oxford, England). 2025. DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keaf205.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.