MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.4045/tidsskr.09.1285

Медицинская библиотека · Tidsskrift for den Norske laegeforening : tidsskrift for praktisk medicin, ny raekke · 2010

[Neck pain with and without affection of nerve roots].

Nygaard Øystein P, Rø Magne, Andersen Tor Inge, Zwart John-Anker

Аннотация на английскомСтатьяОбзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of neck pain is 30-50 %, and those most affected are women and people in working age. Neck pain and other musculoskeletal complaints are among the most common causes for sick leave and disability pension in Norway, which emphasises the need for guidelines on diagnostic assessment and treatment of these patients.

MATERIAL AND

METHODS

This paper is based on a review of "The Bone and Joint Decade 2000-2010 Task Force on Neck Pain and Its Associated Disorder", Cohrane overviews and some additional sources.

RESULTS

A classification of neck pain into grades I-IV is recommended as a tool for daily clinical work. Unspecific neck pain (grades I and II) is still a challenge and the various underlying conditions are not well defined. Diagnostics and assessment of neck pain is mainly directed towards nerve root affection (grade III) or serious neck disease (grade IV).

INTERPRETATION: Treatment of neck pain is not sufficiently evidence-based, as there are few high-quality publications within this field. Research within the field is clearly needed and should be prioritized nationally.

Для цитирования: Nygaard Øystein P, Rø Magne, Andersen Tor Inge, Zwart John-Anker. [Neck pain with and without affection of nerve roots].. Tidsskrift for den Norske laegeforening : tidsskrift for praktisk medicin, ny raekke. 2010. DOI: 10.4045/tidsskr.09.1285.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.