Annals of plastic surgery · 2021
Reconstruction of Tibia Fracture With Soft Tissue Defect.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Tsai Po-Lun, Ziegler Otto R, Sudario-Lumague Rowena, Lin Tsan-Shiun
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: We aimed to compare different methods to treat lower leg soft tissue defects with tibia fracture using free flaps and pedicled flaps. We also highlighted the aesthetic outcome after using 1-stage secondary debulking procedure for tibia area.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: From December 2000 to March 2017, 83 patients with lower leg defects and tibia fractures were reconstructed using 71 free flaps and 12 pedicled flaps. One-stage secondary debulking procedures were performed for 39 patients after flap reconstruction. Infection control and aesthetic outcomes using 5-point Likert scale were reviewed after a 16-month follow-up.
RESULTS: Twenty-five myocutaneous free flaps, 45 fasciocutaneous free flaps, 1 fibula free flap, 12 pedicled flaps of which 8 were distally based sural artery flaps, and 4 medial gastrocnemius flaps were used. The flap survival rate was 100%. There was no recurrence of osteomyelitis in any patient after reconstruction with any of these flaps. Using a 5-point Likert scale, performance of a 1-stage secondary debulking procedure showed statistically significant difference in terms of contour, color, and texture compared with the group without debulking procedure.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of free flaps and pedicled flaps in the reconstruction of lower leg defects with tibia fracture is reliable and results in good infection control. A 1-stage secondary debulking procedure delivers excellent long-term aesthetic outcome after reconstruction of the tibia area.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: From December 2000 to March 2017, 83 patients with lower leg defects and tibia fractures were reconstructed using 71 free flaps and 12 pedicled flaps. One-stage secondary debulking procedures were performed for 39 patients after flap reconstruction. Infection control and aesthetic outcomes using 5-point Likert scale were reviewed after a 16-month follow-up.
RESULTS: Twenty-five myocutaneous free flaps, 45 fasciocutaneous free flaps, 1 fibula free flap, 12 pedicled flaps of which 8 were distally based sural artery flaps, and 4 medial gastrocnemius flaps were used. The flap survival rate was 100%. There was no recurrence of osteomyelitis in any patient after reconstruction with any of these flaps. Using a 5-point Likert scale, performance of a 1-stage secondary debulking procedure showed statistically significant difference in terms of contour, color, and texture compared with the group without debulking procedure.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of free flaps and pedicled flaps in the reconstruction of lower leg defects with tibia fracture is reliable and results in good infection control. A 1-stage secondary debulking procedure delivers excellent long-term aesthetic outcome after reconstruction of the tibia area.