MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.4184/asj.2016.10.3.495

Медицинская библиотека · Asian spine journal · 2016

Assessment of Lumbar Lordosis and Lumbar Core Strength in Information Technology Professionals.

Mehta Roma Satish, Nagrale Sanket, Dabadghav Rachana, Rairikar Savita, Shayam Ashok, Sancheti Parag

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

STUDY

DESIGN

Observational study.

PURPOSE: To correlate lumbar lordosis and lumbar core strength in information technology (IT) professionals.

OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: IT professionals have to work for long hours in a sitting position, which can affect lumbar lordosis and lumbar core strength.

METHODS

Flexicurve was used to assess the lumbar lordosis, and pressure biofeedback was used to assess the lumbar core strength in the IT professionals. All subjects, both male and female, with and without complaint of low back pain and working for two or more years were included, and subjects with a history of spinal surgery or spinal deformity were excluded from the study. Analysis was done using Pearson's correlation.

RESULTS

For the IT workers, no correlation was seen between lumbar lordosis and lumbar core strength (r=-0.04); however, a weak negative correlation was seen in IT people who complained of pain (r=-0.12), while there was no correlation of lumbar lordosis and lumbar core in IT people who had no complains of pain (r=0.007).

CONCLUSIONS

The study shows that there is no correlation of lumbar lordosis and lumbar core strength in IT professionals, but a weak negative correlation was seen in IT people who complained of pain.

Для цитирования: Mehta Roma Satish, Nagrale Sanket, Dabadghav Rachana, Rairikar Savita, Shayam Ashok, Sancheti Parag. Assessment of Lumbar Lordosis and Lumbar Core Strength in Information Technology Professionals.. Asian spine journal. 2016. DOI: 10.4184/asj.2016.10.3.495.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.