MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s00402-007-0494-5

Медицинская библиотека · Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2007

Digital templating in total hip arthroplasty with the Mayo stem.

Wedemeyer Christian, Quitmann Henning, Xu Jie, Heep Hansjoerg, von Knoch Marius, Saxler Guido

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PATIENTS: In 40 patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty with the Mayo femoral stem we studied how preoperative digital templating corresponded to the actual intraoperative choice of implant size, position, offset and restoration of leg length.

RESULTS

The preoperatively planned sizes of the components showed a high rate of coincidence with the sizes used intraoperatively [Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) 0.661-0.810]. However, the agreements in offset and CCD correction were poor (ICC 0.476, 0.253). This could be statistically attributed to the change in the distance from the medial margin of the stem to the medial margin of the medial femoral cortex and the height of osteotomy. The agreement in leg length correction was moderate (ICC 0.583), which was attributed to the change in the hip rotation center and the height of osteotomy.

CONCLUSION

Careful preoperative planning was useful for accurate size choice of the Mayo prosthesis. Factors such as the height of osteotomy and the distance from the medial margin of the stem to the medial margin of the medial femoral cortex in relation to the position of the Mayo stem should be taken into account in order to restore ideal offset and leg length.

Для цитирования: Wedemeyer Christian, Quitmann Henning, Xu Jie, Heep Hansjoerg, von Knoch Marius, Saxler Guido. Digital templating in total hip arthroplasty with the Mayo stem.. Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery. 2007. DOI: 10.1007/s00402-007-0494-5.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.