Implementation of a Hand Training Curriculum in Junior Resident Education: Experience at a Military Orthopedic Residency Program.

PURPOSE: The American Society for Surgery of the Hand developed the Surgery Training and Educational Platform (STEP) in order to assess essential skills in hand surgery. The American Society for Surgery of the Hand designed modules spanning both osseous and soft tissue skills aimed to be cost effective for the purpose of orthopedic surgical education. The STEP curriculum was adapted and implemented at a single military orthopedic residency program.

METHODS

The following six modules were implemented: (1) depth of plunge, (2) scaphoid pinning, (3) phalangeal fracture pinning, (4) microsurgery, (5) full-thickness skin graft harvest, and (6) wrist arthroscopy. Both first- (PGY1) and second-year (PGY2) residents participated. Scores were calculated according to the original STEP curriculum criteria and were compared with historic data from the previous year. All residents responded to an evaluation questionnaire following the performance of the tasks.

RESULTS

The PGY2 cohort outperformed PGY1 cohorts across all modules except for the depth of plunge and scaphoid fixation modules. In the phalangeal pinning module, PGY2s did significantly better when compared with pooled PGY1 performance and their own PGY1 performance (P < .05). In the microsurgery module, PGY2s scored better than pooled PGY1s. In the full-thickness skin grafting module, PGY2s outperformed PGY1s (P < .05). On the post-task evaluation, residents unanimously responded that this was a valuable exercise, but the time required to complete all the modules was significant, similar to that of the previous year survey.

CONCLUSIONS

The STEP simulation is a cost effective and reliable program to engage residents in hand surgery-related skills. However, adaptations should be encouraged according to institutional resources to provide the most inclusive training platform possible per institutional constraints. The STEP simulation is interpreted by residents as a valuable exercise but requires a significant time commitment that could be a barrier to implementation and regular use.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.