Sonographic assessment of cartilage damage at the metacarpal head in rheumatoid arthritis: qualitative versus quantitative methods.

OBJECTIVE

To test the validity of the OMERACT semi-quantitative score by comparing with a quantitative method in the US assessment of hyaline cartilage at the metacarpal head (MH) in patients with RA and healthy controls (HCs).

METHODS

The hyaline cartilage from the second to fifth MHs of both hands was scanned. Hyaline cartilage was scored semi-quantitatively and quantitatively by measuring cartilage thickness and comparing with reference values. In RA patients, radiographic joint space narrowing (JSN) was scored on the same joints using the Simple Erosion Narrowing Score (SENS).

RESULTS

A total of 408 MHs in 51 RA patients and 320 MHs in 40 HSs were evaluated. The OMERACT semi-quantitative score was quicker to perform than the quantitative method [6.0 min (s.d. 0.5) vs 8.0 (1.5); P < 0.01]. A significant correlation between the US scores (R = 0.68) and between the US scores and the JSN-SENS (R = 0.61 and R = 0.63 for the semi-quantitative and quantitative method, respectively) was found. The frequency of cartilage abnormalities was similar between the two US methods in RA patients (58.8% and 51.0% of RA patients for the semi-quantitative and quantitative method, respectively; P = 0.46), while the former revealed more abnormalities in HCs (27.5% and 7.5% of HCs; P = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

The higher feasibility of the OMERACT semi-quantitative score suggests its use as a first-choice method in the evaluation of cartilage damage. However, despite its limits, the quantitative assessment of HCs, providing patient-tailored information with age- and sex-corrected cut-off values, may represent a valid supplement for optimizing the evaluation of cartilage damage in selected cases.