Sleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society · 2024
Assessing actigraphy performance for daytime sleep detection following stroke: insights from inpatient monitoring in a rehabilitation hospital.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Wang Jiayi E, Sindorf Jacob, Chen Pin-Wei, Wu Jessica, Gonzales Adrian, O'Brien Megan K, Sunderrajan Aashna, Knutson Kristen L, Zee Phyllis C, Wolfe Lisa, Arora Vineet M, Jayaraman Arun
Аннотация
STUDY OBJECTIVES: Stroke can result in or exacerbate various sleep disorders. The presence of behaviors such as daytime sleepiness poststroke can indicate underlying sleep disorders which can significantly impact functional recovery and thus require prompt detection and monitoring for improved care. Actigraphy, a quantitative measurement technology, has been primarily validated for nighttime sleep in healthy adults; however, its validity for daytime sleep monitoring is currently unknown. Therefore this study aims to identify the best-performing actigraphy sensor and algorithm for detecting daytime sleep in poststroke individuals.
METHODS: Participants wore Actiwatch Spectrum and ActiGraph wGT3X-BT on their less-affected wrist, while trained observers recorded daytime sleep occurrences and activity levels (active, sedentary, and asleep) during non-therapy times. Algorithms, Actiwatch (Autoscore AMRI) and ActiGraph (Cole-Kripke, Sadeh), were compared with on-site observations and assessed using F2 scores, emphasizing sensitivity to detect daytime sleep.
RESULTS: Twenty-seven participants from an inpatient stroke rehabilitation unit contributed 173.5 hours of data. The ActiGraph Cole-Kripke algorithm (minute sleep time = 15 minutes, bedtime = 10 minutes, and wake time = 10 minutes) achieved the highest F2 score (0.59). Notably, when participants were in bed, the ActiGraph Cole-Kripke algorithm continued to outperform Sadeh and Actiwatch AMRI, with an F2 score of 0.69.
CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrates both Actiwatch and ActiGraph's ability to detect daytime sleep, particularly during bed rest. ActiGraph (Cole-Kripke) algorithm exhibited a more balanced sleep detection profile and higher F2 scores compared to Actiwatch, offering valuable insights for optimizing daytime sleep monitoring with actigraphy in stroke patients.
METHODS: Participants wore Actiwatch Spectrum and ActiGraph wGT3X-BT on their less-affected wrist, while trained observers recorded daytime sleep occurrences and activity levels (active, sedentary, and asleep) during non-therapy times. Algorithms, Actiwatch (Autoscore AMRI) and ActiGraph (Cole-Kripke, Sadeh), were compared with on-site observations and assessed using F2 scores, emphasizing sensitivity to detect daytime sleep.
RESULTS: Twenty-seven participants from an inpatient stroke rehabilitation unit contributed 173.5 hours of data. The ActiGraph Cole-Kripke algorithm (minute sleep time = 15 minutes, bedtime = 10 minutes, and wake time = 10 minutes) achieved the highest F2 score (0.59). Notably, when participants were in bed, the ActiGraph Cole-Kripke algorithm continued to outperform Sadeh and Actiwatch AMRI, with an F2 score of 0.69.
CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrates both Actiwatch and ActiGraph's ability to detect daytime sleep, particularly during bed rest. ActiGraph (Cole-Kripke) algorithm exhibited a more balanced sleep detection profile and higher F2 scores compared to Actiwatch, offering valuable insights for optimizing daytime sleep monitoring with actigraphy in stroke patients.