MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1123397

Медицинская библиотека · Frontiers in surgery · 2023

A novel classification of subaxial cervical hemivertebrae and associated surgical management.

Wu Jinhui, Hu Miao, Tao Zhengbo, Zhou Xin, Jiang Heng, Lin Tao, Ma Jun, Gao Rui, Wang Ce, Zhou Xuhui

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To propose and validate a new classification of surgical methods for patients with subaxial cervical hemivertebrae.

METHOD: This article reviewed cases diagnosed with subaxial cervical hemivertebrae in our hospital from January 2008 to December 2019. The results of preoperative (initial visit), postoperative and/or final follow-up were assessed using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, Neck Disability Index (NDI) score, spinal balance parameters, and Scoliosis Research Society-22 Questionnaire (SRS-22). We also performed a reliability study to assess this classification.

RESULT: The classification includes three types. Each type can be divided into two subtypes, and a preliminary algorithm is proposed. Type I: There is an obvious appearance deformity in the neck, there are hemivertebrae in the cervical spine, and only a single hemivertebra of the subaxial cervical hemivertebra needs to be resected. Type II: There is an obvious appearance deformity in the neck, there are hemivertebrae in the cervical spine, and multiple subaxial cervical hemivertebrae need to be removed. Type III: No apparent deformity in the neck, at least one subaxial cervical hemivertebra existed or Klipper-Feil syndrome. Each type is divided into two subtypes, A and B, according to whether the upper and lower adjacent vertebral bodies of the rescected hemivertebra(e) are fused. We propose corresponding treatment methods for different types. We included a total of 121 patients and reviewed the prognosis for each type of patient. All patients achieved satisfactory results. The reliability study showed that the mean interobserver agreement was 91.8% (89.3%-93.4%), and the κ value was 0.845 (0.800-0.875). The intraobserver agreement ranged from 93.4% to 97.5%, with a mean κ value of 0.929 (0.881 to 0.954).

CONCLUSION

In our study, we proposed and validated a new classification of subaxial cervical hemivertebrae and proposed corresponding treatment plans for different classifications.

Для цитирования: Wu Jinhui, Hu Miao, Tao Zhengbo, Zhou Xin, Jiang Heng, Lin Tao, Ma Jun, Gao Rui, Wang Ce, Zhou Xuhui. A novel classification of subaxial cervical hemivertebrae and associated surgical management.. Frontiers in surgery. 2023. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1123397.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.