DOI 10.1093/rheumatology/key299
Differentiating knee pain phenotypes in older adults: a prospective cohort study.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
To identify and validate knee pain phenotypes in an older population across different pain-related domains over 10.7 years.
METHODS
A total of 963 participants (mean age 63 years) from a population-based older adult cohort study were studied at baseline and followed up at 2.6 (n = 875), 5.1 (n = 768) and 10.7 years (n = 563). Baseline demographic, psychological, lifestyle and comorbidities data were obtained and MRI was performed to measure knee structural pathology. WOMAC pain and pain at multiple sites were assessed by questionnaires at each time-point. Latent class analysis was used to identify knee pain phenotypes, considering sex, BMI, emotional problems, education level, comorbidities, number of painful sites and knee structural pathology.
RESULTS
Three pain phenotypes were identified: Class 1: high prevalence of emotional problems and low prevalence of structural damage (25%); Class 2: high prevalence of structural damage and low prevalence of emotional problems (20%); Class 3: low prevalence of emotional problems and low prevalence of structural damage (55%). Participants within Class 1 and 2 had greater BMI, more comorbidities, a higher prevalence of radiographic knee OA and knee structural pathology compared with Class 3. Furthermore, compared with Class 2 and 3, WOMAC pain and number of painful sites were consistently greater at each time-point over 10.7 years in Class 1. Results were similar when the analyses were restricted to participants with radiographic knee OA.
CONCLUSION
Psychological and structural factors interact with each other to exacerbate pain perception, suggesting that tailored treatment approaches for older people with knee pain in clinical practice are needed.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.