MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.14202/vetworld.2015.561-566

Медицинская библиотека · Veterinary world · 2015

Seroprevalence and comparison of different serological tests for brucellosis detection in small ruminants.

Sadhu Dashrath B, Panchasara H H, Chauhan H C, Sutariya D R, Parmar V L, Prajapati H B

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

AIM: The aim was to study the seroprevalence and efficacy of the different serological tests used for detection of antibody against Brucella species in small ruminants of Banaskantha district of North-Gujarat.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

Total 1000 serum samples comprising of 485 from sheep and 515 from goat tested for detection of antibodies against the Brucella species by three different serological tests viz., Rose bengal plate test (RBPT), Standard tube agglutination test (STAT), and Indirect Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (I-ELISA).

RESULTS

The seroprevalence of brucellosis in small ruminants was 11.30%, 11.10%, and 8.80% by RBPT, STAT, and I-ELISA, respectively. The seroprevalence of brucellosis was found to be higher in sheep than goats. The sensitivity of RBPT was found slight more than STAT, but the specificity of both tests was same. In this study, the overall agreement of RBPT and STAT with I-ELISA was found 92.50% and 92.30% in small ruminants, respectively.

CONCLUSION

I-ELISA was a better serological test as compared to RBPT and STAT in the sense of sensitivity, specificity, and rapidity and it could be advocated for screening of brucellosis in sheep and goats.

Для цитирования: Sadhu Dashrath B, Panchasara H H, Chauhan H C, Sutariya D R, Parmar V L, Prajapati H B. Seroprevalence and comparison of different serological tests for brucellosis detection in small ruminants.. Veterinary world. 2015. DOI: 10.14202/vetworld.2015.561-566.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.