MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/jsp2.1043

Медицинская библиотека · JOR spine · 2019

Controversies in regenerative medicine: Should intervertebral disc degeneration be treated with mesenchymal stem cells?

Loibl Markus, Wuertz-Kozak Karin, Vadala Gianluca, Lang Siegmund, Fairbank Jeremy, Urban Jill P

СтатьяОбзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Low back pain (LBP) can significantly reduce the quality of life of patients, and has a considerable economic and social impact worldwide. It is commonly associated with disc degeneration, even though many people with degenerate discs are asymptomatic. Degenerate disc disease (DDD), is thus a common term for intervertebral disc (IVD) degeneration associated with LBP. Degeneration is thought to lead to LBP because of nerve ingrowth into the degenerate disc, inflammation, or because degradation of extracellular matrix (ECM) alters spinal biomechanics inappropriately. Thus, while the objectives of some interventions for LBP are to control pain intensity, other interventions aim to deal with the consequences of disc degeneration through stabilizing the disc surgically, by inserting artificial discs or by repairing the disc biologically and preventing progressive IVD degeneration. Despite tremendous research efforts, treatment of LBP through the use of regenerative interventions aiming to repair the IVD is still controversial. The use of mesenchymal stem cells for IVD regeneration in a patient-based case will be discussed by an ensemble of clinicians and researchers.

Для цитирования: Loibl Markus, Wuertz-Kozak Karin, Vadala Gianluca, Lang Siegmund, Fairbank Jeremy, Urban Jill P. Controversies in regenerative medicine: Should intervertebral disc degeneration be treated with mesenchymal stem cells?. JOR spine. 2019. DOI: 10.1002/jsp2.1043.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.