MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s00381-008-0801-7

Медицинская библиотека · Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2009

Spinal cord tethering by aberrant nerve root in myelomeningocele: case report.

Utsuki Satoshi, Yamada Masaru, Yamazaki Tomoya, Sato Sumito, Nakahara Kuniaki, Oka Hidehiro, Fujii Kiyotaka

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

A 2,796-gram male baby was born at 40 weeks gestation by vaginal delivery. Soon after, he was admitted at our department for treatment of a dorsal appendage.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging showed a low-position spinal cord, skin-covered myelomeningocele, syringomyelia, and a tethered cord. Resection of the caudal appendage and tethering tissue was performed 22 days after birth under electrophysiological monitoring. Histopathological examination of the caudal appendage that was covered with skin revealed the presence of spinal cord tissue and peripheral nerve tissue. The string-like tethering tissue that extended from the spinal cord to the caudalis was a nerve root, and there was fiberization of the caudalis. The syringomyelia was improved at postoperative MR imaging. To our knowledge, there is no report of a similar case in the literature. We report rare combination of myelomeningocele and spinal cord tethering by aberrant nerve root with thoracic syringomyelia.

Для цитирования: Utsuki Satoshi, Yamada Masaru, Yamazaki Tomoya, Sato Sumito, Nakahara Kuniaki, Oka Hidehiro, Fujii Kiyotaka. Spinal cord tethering by aberrant nerve root in myelomeningocele: case report.. Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery. 2009. DOI: 10.1007/s00381-008-0801-7.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.