Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine · 2011
Calcium pyrophosphate and monosodium urate crystals in synovial fluid as a cause of pseudoeosinophilia.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Robier Christoph, Neubauer Manfred, Quehenberger Franz, Stettin Mariana, Rainer Franz
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Synovial fluid (SF) leukocytes can be counted microscopically in a Neubauer chamber or by automated procedures using haematology analysers. Knowledge of laboratory artefacts is crucial for the correct interpretation of results obtained using automated methods. SF pseudoeosinophilia has recently been described as a new artefact in patients with crystal-related arthropathies. We investigated whether pseudoeosinophilia of SF is restricted to crystal-related disorders, or if it may also occur in other arthropathies.
METHODS: We compared the percentages of eosinophils in 120 crystal containing SF samples with 185 crystal-free specimens using the Wilcoxon test. Crystal positive samples, determined by polarised microscopy, contained at least two monosodium urate or calcium pyrophosphate crystals per 10 high power fields (630× magnification). True SF eosinophilia was ruled out by microscopic examination of stained slides.
RESULTS: Crystal positive samples had significantly higher percentages of eosinophils than the controls (p<0.0001). No significant differences between the two crystal types were found (p=0.693). Thus, pseudoeosinophilia was significantly correlated with the presence of crystals, and none of the distinct crystal types was more likely to be associated with pseudoeosinophilia.
CONCLUSIONS: In this study, SF pseudoeosinophilia was confirmed as a crystal-related laboratory artefact which has to be considered in the interpretation of automated SF leukocyte differential counts.
METHODS: We compared the percentages of eosinophils in 120 crystal containing SF samples with 185 crystal-free specimens using the Wilcoxon test. Crystal positive samples, determined by polarised microscopy, contained at least two monosodium urate or calcium pyrophosphate crystals per 10 high power fields (630× magnification). True SF eosinophilia was ruled out by microscopic examination of stained slides.
RESULTS: Crystal positive samples had significantly higher percentages of eosinophils than the controls (p<0.0001). No significant differences between the two crystal types were found (p=0.693). Thus, pseudoeosinophilia was significantly correlated with the presence of crystals, and none of the distinct crystal types was more likely to be associated with pseudoeosinophilia.
CONCLUSIONS: In this study, SF pseudoeosinophilia was confirmed as a crystal-related laboratory artefact which has to be considered in the interpretation of automated SF leukocyte differential counts.