MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s00296-011-1898-7

Медицинская библиотека · Rheumatology international · 2011

Who was Pontormo's Halberdier? The evidence from pathology.

Weisz George M, Albury W R, Lippi Donatella, Matucci-Cerinic Marco

Историческая статьяСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

The identity of the young man in Jacopo Pontormo's Portrait of a Halberdier has long been disputed by art historians. Two probable candidates have been identified: Francesco Guardi, a Florentine nobleman, and Cosimo I de' Medici, Duke of Florence from 1537 and Grand Duke of Tuscany from 1569. The present study is intended to help resolve this controversy by providing evidence, based on pathological criteria, for the identification of Pontormo's Halberdier. Pathological anomalies of the finger joints in the left hand of the Halberdier are compared with those in three acknowledged portraits of Cosimo I de' Medici. These three portraits show the hands of Cosimo in approximately the same position as the Halberdier's hand, thus allowing a meaningful comparison. Detailed observation indicates that there is a close correspondence between the Halberdier's hand deformity and that of Cosimo I in the comparison portraits. This deformity is also consistent with what is known about the medical history of Cosimo I and with the skeletal remains of his left hand. The pathological evidence supports the conclusion that Pontormo's Halberdier is Cosimo I as a young man and that the painting was done around 1537 when Cosimo first became Duke.

Для цитирования: Weisz George M, Albury W R, Lippi Donatella, Matucci-Cerinic Marco. Who was Pontormo's Halberdier? The evidence from pathology.. Rheumatology international. 2011. DOI: 10.1007/s00296-011-1898-7.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.