MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/micr.30750

Медицинская библиотека · Microsurgery · 2021

Reconstruction of an infected midshaft radius and ulna nonunion using a free vascularized fibula and medial femoral condyle flap.

Willemot Laurent, Stewart David, Lawson Richard

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Conventional grafts do not perform well in the treatment of large diaphyseal bone defects. Forearm nonunions are especially challenging due to complex biomechanical and kinematic demands. Free bone flaps may yield more predictable bony restoration in these cases, while keeping morbidity acceptable to the patient. We aim to illustrate one combination of flaps which can be used in these conditions. This article reports on a 23 year old patient with an 8 cm diaphyseal nonunion of the radius and a similar 7 cm defect of the ulna after infection of fracture fixation hardware. The radius was treated with a free fibular flap (FFF) and the ulna with a medial femoral condyle (MFC) flap in a staged procedure after initial debridement. The patient was followed up for 6 months without significant complications. Both flaps healed within 3 months, yet the MFC demonstrated faster bony incorporation. We attributed this to the spongious nature of the MFC flap compared to the thick cortical FFF. This case report hopes to illustrate one type of flap combination for extensive forearm bone defects. The selection and approach minimizes donor site morbidity to a single limb and possibly hastens bony union of the forearm.

Для цитирования: Willemot Laurent, Stewart David, Lawson Richard. Reconstruction of an infected midshaft radius and ulna nonunion using a free vascularized fibula and medial femoral condyle flap.. Microsurgery. 2021. DOI: 10.1002/micr.30750.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.