Clinical implant dentistry and related research · 2023
Full block or split block?-Comparison of two different autogenous block grafting techniques for alveolar ridge reconstruction.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Mertens Christian, Büsch Christopher, Goldenbaum Konrad, Ristow Oliver, Hoffmann Jürgen, Wang Hom-Lay, Hoffmann Korbinian Jochen
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate radiographic bone gain after alveolar ridge augmentation with two different designs of autogenous block graft harvested from the mandible.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Alveolar ridge defects were evaluated by preoperative cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and grafted in a staged approach using intraoral block grafts. The ridge augmentation was either performed using the full-block technique (group 1) or the split-block technique (cortical plate with autogenous bone chips) (group 2). After 4 months of bone healing, a further CBCT scan was performed before implant placement. Horizontal and vertical bone gain were measured.
RESULTS: In this retrospective study, 91 patients were grafted with block grafts (36 patients with full-block grafts; 55 patients with split-block grafts) resulting in 171 block grafts in total. The mean horizontal bone gain was 3.37 ± 0.71 mm in group 1 and 5.79 ± 2.20 mm in group 2. A linear mixed-effect model also showed a statistically significant group difference (p < 0.001, estimate: 3.455, 95% CI: [2.082-4.829]). The mean vertical bone gain was 2.85 ± 0.73 mm in group 1 and 7.60 ± 1.87 mm in group 2. A linear mixed-effect model also showed a statistically significant group difference (p: 0.029, estimate: 3.126, 95% CI: [0.718-5.557]). Mean marginal bone level was 0.33 ± 0.37 mm (group 1) and 0.17 ± 0.29 mm (group 2).
CONCLUSION: The split-block technique resulted in a greater bone gain than the full-block technique. This effect was observed in both the vertical and the horizontal dimensions.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Alveolar ridge defects were evaluated by preoperative cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and grafted in a staged approach using intraoral block grafts. The ridge augmentation was either performed using the full-block technique (group 1) or the split-block technique (cortical plate with autogenous bone chips) (group 2). After 4 months of bone healing, a further CBCT scan was performed before implant placement. Horizontal and vertical bone gain were measured.
RESULTS: In this retrospective study, 91 patients were grafted with block grafts (36 patients with full-block grafts; 55 patients with split-block grafts) resulting in 171 block grafts in total. The mean horizontal bone gain was 3.37 ± 0.71 mm in group 1 and 5.79 ± 2.20 mm in group 2. A linear mixed-effect model also showed a statistically significant group difference (p < 0.001, estimate: 3.455, 95% CI: [2.082-4.829]). The mean vertical bone gain was 2.85 ± 0.73 mm in group 1 and 7.60 ± 1.87 mm in group 2. A linear mixed-effect model also showed a statistically significant group difference (p: 0.029, estimate: 3.126, 95% CI: [0.718-5.557]). Mean marginal bone level was 0.33 ± 0.37 mm (group 1) and 0.17 ± 0.29 mm (group 2).
CONCLUSION: The split-block technique resulted in a greater bone gain than the full-block technique. This effect was observed in both the vertical and the horizontal dimensions.