International journal of rheumatic diseases · 2019
Performance evaluation of a line blot assay system for detection of anti-PM-Scl antibody in Japanese patients with systemic sclerosis.
Сравнительное исследованиеОценочное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hamaguchi Yasuhito, Kuwana Masataka, Takehara Kazuhiko
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the performance of a line blot (LB) assay for identifying anti-PM-Scl antibody (Ab).
METHODS: We screened 56 serum samples from systemic sclerosis patients using a protein immunoprecipitation (IP) assay and an LB assay (Systemic Sclerosis Profile Euroline® Blot test kit) to detect anti-PM-Scl Ab. We compared the results obtained by the IP and LB assays.
RESULTS: Among the 56 serum samples of SSc patients, 9 sera were positive for anti-PM-Scl75 Ab and 1 for anti-PM-Scl100 Ab by the LB assay. The protein IP assay revealed that none of the samples precipitated 75 or 100 kDa proteins identical to the anti-PM-Scl Ab reference serum, regardless of the positive or negative results obtained in the LB assay. Therefore, the false-positive rates for both anti-PM-Scl75 Ab and anti-PM-Scl100 Ab by the LB assay were 100%.
CONCLUSION: Detection of anti-PM-Scl Ab assessed with a commercial LB assay requires extreme caution since it may yield false-positive data.
METHODS: We screened 56 serum samples from systemic sclerosis patients using a protein immunoprecipitation (IP) assay and an LB assay (Systemic Sclerosis Profile Euroline® Blot test kit) to detect anti-PM-Scl Ab. We compared the results obtained by the IP and LB assays.
RESULTS: Among the 56 serum samples of SSc patients, 9 sera were positive for anti-PM-Scl75 Ab and 1 for anti-PM-Scl100 Ab by the LB assay. The protein IP assay revealed that none of the samples precipitated 75 or 100 kDa proteins identical to the anti-PM-Scl Ab reference serum, regardless of the positive or negative results obtained in the LB assay. Therefore, the false-positive rates for both anti-PM-Scl75 Ab and anti-PM-Scl100 Ab by the LB assay were 100%.
CONCLUSION: Detection of anti-PM-Scl Ab assessed with a commercial LB assay requires extreme caution since it may yield false-positive data.