MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1159/000320735

Медицинская библиотека · Fetal diagnosis and therapy · 2010

Revisiting acrania: same phenotype, different aetiologies.

Gorgal Rosário, Ramalho Carla, Brandão Otília, Matias Alexandra, Montenegro Nuno

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the contribution of prenatal and postmortem examinations in establishing the aetiology of acrania.

METHODS

Retrospective evaluation of 14 cases of acrania managed through elective termination of pregnancy.

RESULTS

The median maternal age was 30 years (range 18-40) and median gestational age at diagnosis was 13 weeks (range 12-15). One mother had epilepsy and was taking anticonvulsants and another had uncontrolled type II diabetes mellitus. Only 3 women were using folic acid at conception. Chromosomal abnormalities were detected in 3 of 8 cases analyzed. Unilateral anopthalmia, cervical rachischisis, midline facial and limb defects coexisted with acrania in 4 cases. Acrania with craniofacial dysmorphism and asymmetrical finger amputation were observed in a case of amniotic band syndrome. A previous history of anencephaly was documented in 1 case.

CONCLUSION

Acrania is a characteristic phenotypic expression of a variety of different aetiologies. Investigation with cytogenetic studies and postmortem are essential to provide a definitive answer. This will provide a better understanding of the underlying aetiology and help establish the recurrence risk for future pregnancies.

Для цитирования: Gorgal Rosário, Ramalho Carla, Brandão Otília, Matias Alexandra, Montenegro Nuno. Revisiting acrania: same phenotype, different aetiologies.. Fetal diagnosis and therapy. 2010. DOI: 10.1159/000320735.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.