MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/01.smj.0000216495.79818.eb

Медицинская библиотека · Southern medical journal · 2006

Primary care house staff attitudes toward osteoporosis management.

McNearney Terry A, Shepherd Angela J, Chhabra Ajoy, Goel Niti

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

This study assessed possible institutional and patient-related factors influencing the delivery of postmenopausal osteoporosis (PMO) care and the diagnostic priority placed on addressing PMO, relative to other common medical conditions, by primary care house staff at our institution.

METHODS

A questionnaire was designed and distributed to eligible house staff at our institution.

RESULTS

Approximately 50% (n = 52) of the house staff participated. The supervising clinic attending, patients' lack of insurance, accessibility to medical care, comorbid conditions, and university formulary were reported to influence decisions regarding osteoporosis care. Osteoporosis was ranked 6th of 7 medical issues (hypertension, coronary artery disease, diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, adult immunizations, osteoporosis, thyroid disease) to address during a comprehensive medical visit.

CONCLUSIONS

Our institution's primary care house staff reported multiple influences on decision making regarding osteoporosis care, and an overall low priority to address this issue. Based on PMO's associated morbidity and mortality, primary care training programs are challenged to put resources toward optimizing house staff delivery of osteoporosis care.

Для цитирования: McNearney Terry A, Shepherd Angela J, Chhabra Ajoy, Goel Niti. Primary care house staff attitudes toward osteoporosis management.. Southern medical journal. 2006. DOI: 10.1097/01.smj.0000216495.79818.eb.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.