MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/17531934241242676

Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of hand surgery, European volume · 2024

Radiocarpal and midcarpal kinematics in scapholunate instability: a four-dimensional CT study in vivo.

Amarasooriya Melanie, Al Dirini Rami, Bryant Kimberley, Ian Bain Gregory

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

The distribution of motion between the radiocarpal and midcarpal joints in scapholunate instability is poorly understood. This has potential implications in predicting degenerative changes and in selecting salvage procedures. We studied 19 healthy wrists and 19 wrists with scapholunate instability using dynamic computed tomography during wrist extension to flexion and ulnar to radial deviation. Radiocarpal and midcarpal kinematics of the scaphoid and the lunate were computed. In scapholunate instability, in the radial column, there was increased motion in the radiocarpal joint when the wrist was radially deviating beyond 10° or moving from 70° to 40° extension. In both groups, the capitolunate joint was the dominant articulation in the central column. In scapholunate instability, there was significantly more capitolunate motion during 70° to 30° extension. These changes may predict the development of radioscaphoid arthritis and enable identifying a kinematically abnormal wrist. The motion distribution in scapholunate instability was abnormal beyond 10° of radial deviation and between 70° and 40° of wrist extension.Level of evidence: III.

Для цитирования: Amarasooriya Melanie, Al Dirini Rami, Bryant Kimberley, Ian Bain Gregory. Radiocarpal and midcarpal kinematics in scapholunate instability: a four-dimensional CT study in vivo.. The Journal of hand surgery, European volume. 2024. DOI: 10.1177/17531934241242676.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.