DOI 10.1016/j.jjcc.2014.12.003
Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is associated with an increased incidence of atrial fibrillation (AF). This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of catheter ablation (CA) in the treatment of AF in patients with RA, which has not been previously reported.
METHODS
A total of 15 RA patients with AF who underwent CA were enrolled. For each RA patient, we selected 4 individuals (control group, 60 patients in total) who presented for AF ablation in the absence of structural heart or systemic disease and matched the RA patients with same gender, age (±2 years), type of AF, and procedure date.
RESULTS
Patients with RA had a significantly higher C-reactive protein level (1.81 ± 2.35 mg/dl vs. 4.14 ± 2.30 mg/dl, p=0.0320), white blood cell count (5632 ± 1200 mm(3) vs. 6361 ± 1567 mm(3), p=0.0482), and neutrophil count (3308 ± 973 mm(3) vs. 3949 ± 1461 mm(3), p=0.0441). At 2-year follow-up, atrial tachyarrhythmia (ATa) recurrence rate in the RA group (33.3%, 5/15) was similar to that in the control group (31.7%, 19/60; p=0.579) after single procedure. In all the five patients from the RA group who developed recurrence, ATa relapsed within 90 days following index procedure (median recurrence time 18 days vs. 92 days in control group; p=0.0373). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that hypertension and left atrial diameter but not RA, C-reactive protein, white blood cell count, and neutrophil count were independent predictors of ATa recurrence.
CONCLUSIONS
Catheter ablation of AF can be safely performed in patients with RA, with a success rate comparable to that of patients without RA. RA patients tend to develop early ATa recurrence after AF ablation.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.