MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/jom.0000000000003146

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of occupational and environmental medicine · 2024

Potential Misinformation in the Official Disability Guidelines About the Diagnosis and Treatment of Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy.

Dwyer Darby, Ramachandran Shyam S, McCall Kyle, Ragsdale Masen, Ring David, Ramtin Sina

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

We selected statements in the Official Disability Guidelines that had the potential to reinforce misconceptions regarding symptoms from rotator cuff tendinopathy. These statements were revised and presented with the original statement to specialists.

METHODS

Twelve statements regarding rotator cuff tendinopathy were identified as deviating from principles based on ethics, values, and the evidence regarding both pathophysiology and human illness behavior. One hundred fifteen upper extremity surgeons reviewed both original and revised versions of the statements and indicated their preference.

RESULTS

We found that upper extremity surgeons preferred 3 revised statements, 4 Official Disability Guidelines statements, and 5 were rated as neutral between the 2 statements.

CONCLUSIONS

Statements revised for evidence, ethics, and healthy mindset were not preferred by specialists, which may indicate limited awareness about how negative thoughts and distressing symptoms impact human illness.

Для цитирования: Dwyer Darby, Ramachandran Shyam S, McCall Kyle, Ragsdale Masen, Ring David, Ramtin Sina. Potential Misinformation in the Official Disability Guidelines About the Diagnosis and Treatment of Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy.. Journal of occupational and environmental medicine. 2024. DOI: 10.1097/jom.0000000000003146.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.