MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/j.1464-410x.1983.tb03383.x

Медицинская библиотека · British journal of urology · 1983

Studies on the prevalence and epidemiology of urinary stone disease in men in Leeds.

Robertson W G, Peacock M, Baker M, Marshall D H, Pearlman B, Speed R, Sergeant V, Smith A

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

A postal survey among 2% of men in Leeds showed that the prevalence of urinary stone disease is 3.8%. The prevalence of upper urinary tract and spontaneously passed stones increases progressively from 0.7% in social class 5 to 5.0% in social class 1 but that of bladder stones (0.7% in the group as a whole) is independent of social class. There is an initial peak of upper urinary tract and spontaneously passed stones commencing at age 20 and having a projected prevalence at age 90 of 5.7% and a second peak of bladder stones, commencing about age 50, with a projected prevalence of 1.9%. The prevalence of stone disease increases according to the order: single less than divorced/separated less than married less than widowed men. A family history of stones tends to be higher amongst relatives of stone-formers than amongst the corresponding relatives of control subjects, the male/female ratio being 2:1. The occurrence of urinary stones is significantly associated with that of gallstones, high blood pressure, backache, arthritis and gout but not with that of peptic ulcer, diabetes, thyroid disease or bronchitis.

Для цитирования: Robertson W G, Peacock M, Baker M, Marshall D H, Pearlman B, Speed R, Sergeant V, Smith A. Studies on the prevalence and epidemiology of urinary stone disease in men in Leeds.. British journal of urology. 1983. DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.1983.tb03383.x.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.