The prevalence of nephrolithiasis in patients with primary gout: a cross-sectional study using helical computed tomography.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
To investigate the prevalence of nephrolithiasis in gouty patients by computed tomography (CT) imaging and to compare it with the "prevalence" of urolithiasis calculated from histories of urinary tract calculus.
METHODS
The kidneys of 383 male patients with primary gout were examined using an unenhanced 2-row helical CT detector, imaging at 2 mm collimation and a helical pitch of 3. The urolithiasis history of the 383 patients was investigated by inquiry. Patients' ages, body mass index, and laboratory data from a 1-hour clearance test were determined.
RESULTS
CT scans confirmed nephrolithiasis in 103 (26.9%, 95% confidence interval 22.5%-31.6%) of the 383 gouty patients, and history of urinary calculus was positive in 65 (17.0%, 95% confidence interval 13.4%-21.1%) of the 383. However, 64 (62%) of the 103 stone-formers identified by CT had no history of urolithiasis. There was a significant difference between the ages of the 103 stone-formers identified by CT and the 65 stone-formers identified from the history.
CONCLUSION
The prevalence of nephrolithiasis obtained using CT was 26.9% in the 383 patients with primary gout. Our results imply that we cannot determine an accurate prevalence of urolithiasis from a patient's history. Most of the "prevalence" reported in the past may not correspond to a statistically justifiable one, but instead to the "cumulative incidence" during the contraction period of gout. Thus, the prevalence of nephrolithiasis confirmed by a cross-sectional method and the "prevalence" of urolithiasis calculated from patients' calculus histories should be clearly distinguished.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.