MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1186/s13018-021-02222-x

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2021

Locked compression plating versus retrograde intramedullary nailing in the treatment of periprosthetic supracondylar knee fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Magill Henry, Ponugoti Nikhil, Selim Amr, Platt James

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяМетаанализСистематический обзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Periprosthetic fractures of the distal femur above a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) have traditionally been managed by locking compression plating (LCP). This technique is technically demanding and is associated with high rates of non-union and revision. More recently, retrograde intramedullary nailing (RIMN) has been proposed as an acceptable alternative. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate clinical outcomes in patients with periprosthetic supracondylar femoral fractures who were treated with LCP and RIMN.

METHODS

An up-to-date literature search was carried out using the pre-defined search strategy. All studies that met the inclusion criteria were assessed for methodological quality with the Cochrane's collaboration tool. Operative time, functional score, time-to-union, non-union rates and revision rates were all considered.

CONCLUSION

Ten studies with a total of 531 periprosthetic fractures were included. This meta-analysis has suggested that there is no significant difference in any of the outcome measures assessed. Further, more extensive literature is required on the subject to draw more robust conclusions.

Для цитирования: Magill Henry, Ponugoti Nikhil, Selim Amr, Platt James. Locked compression plating versus retrograde intramedullary nailing in the treatment of periprosthetic supracondylar knee fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.. Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research. 2021. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-021-02222-x.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.