Journal of bodywork and movement therapies · 2024
Cognitive behavioural interventions led by a physiotherapist in chronic non-specific low back pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Систематический обзорСтатьяМетаанализНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Veillon Juliane, Preuilh Arnaud, Wormser Johan
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of physiotherapist-led Cognitive Behavioural Interventions (CBI) with or without physiotherapy is still unclear.
OBJECTIVE: This systematic review (PROSPERO registration number CRD42022321073) aims to determine the effectiveness of physiotherapist-led CBI with or without physiotherapy in comparison to physiotherapy alone on quality of life, disabilities and catastrophization.
METHODS: MEDLINE, Web of Science, Science Direct, and PEDro were searched for randomized controlled trials that investigate the use of CBI versus conventional physiotherapy in chronic NSLBP. To be included CBI had to be performed by a physiotherapist. The primary and secondary outcomes were respectively quality of life and disability.
RESULTS: Fourteen studies were included in qualitative analysis, in which 4 did not meet the PEDro score of 6 or higher. Pooled standardized mean differences from 3 studies showed no difference in quality of life between groups for mental and physical sub-scores at 3 months (SMD 0.02, 95% CI -0.17 to 0.21 and SMD 0.07, 95% CI -0.12 to 0.26 respectively). Pooled standardized mean differences from 9 studies showed no difference in disability between groups at 3, 6 and 12 months (SMD = - 0.40, CI 95% -0.80 to 0.01; SMD -0.18, CI 95% = -0.41 to 0.05; and SMD -0.24, CI 95% = -0.48 to 0.00 respectively).
CONCLUSION: Results of CBI, especially cognitive functional therapy, seem promising in disability management despite a substantial heterogeneity. Furthermore, we found no difference in quality of life.
OBJECTIVE: This systematic review (PROSPERO registration number CRD42022321073) aims to determine the effectiveness of physiotherapist-led CBI with or without physiotherapy in comparison to physiotherapy alone on quality of life, disabilities and catastrophization.
METHODS: MEDLINE, Web of Science, Science Direct, and PEDro were searched for randomized controlled trials that investigate the use of CBI versus conventional physiotherapy in chronic NSLBP. To be included CBI had to be performed by a physiotherapist. The primary and secondary outcomes were respectively quality of life and disability.
RESULTS: Fourteen studies were included in qualitative analysis, in which 4 did not meet the PEDro score of 6 or higher. Pooled standardized mean differences from 3 studies showed no difference in quality of life between groups for mental and physical sub-scores at 3 months (SMD 0.02, 95% CI -0.17 to 0.21 and SMD 0.07, 95% CI -0.12 to 0.26 respectively). Pooled standardized mean differences from 9 studies showed no difference in disability between groups at 3, 6 and 12 months (SMD = - 0.40, CI 95% -0.80 to 0.01; SMD -0.18, CI 95% = -0.41 to 0.05; and SMD -0.24, CI 95% = -0.48 to 0.00 respectively).
CONCLUSION: Results of CBI, especially cognitive functional therapy, seem promising in disability management despite a substantial heterogeneity. Furthermore, we found no difference in quality of life.