MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s00104-005-1023-0

Медицинская библиотека · Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2005

[Ankylosing spondylitis. Therapy and complications of 34 spine fractures].

Zdichavsky M, Blauth M, Knop C, Lange U, Krettek C, Bastian L

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Spine fractures in ankylosing spondylitis (AS) are extremely unstable and associated with a high complication rate. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the therapy and complications of these fractures in AS for a better understanding and management.

PATIENTS AND

METHODS

A total of 32 patients with 34 traumatic spine fractures were treated from 1981 to 2002. Cause of trauma, fracture site, and neurological examination were assessed. Analyses of the management of the treatment and complications were performed.

RESULTS

Banal traumas resulted mostly in spinal fractures at the C 5/6 and C 6/7 level. Two patients were treated conservatively, while the others were stabilized operatively. Before therapy was undertaken, six patients suffered from a cervical radiculopathy, ten patients had an incomplete and two a complete paraplegia. After therapy, neurological status improved in eight patients, but one had a deterioration of neurological symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

Dorsal or combined dorsoventral stabilization of these fractures is necessary for better mobilization of these patients and to avoid further complications.

Для цитирования: Zdichavsky M, Blauth M, Knop C, Lange U, Krettek C, Bastian L. [Ankylosing spondylitis. Therapy and complications of 34 spine fractures].. Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen. 2005. DOI: 10.1007/s00104-005-1023-0.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.