MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1186/s40634-019-0209-1

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2019

Mechanical strength of a new plate compared to six previously tested opening wedge high tibial osteotomy implants.

Diffo Kaze Arnaud, Maas Stefan, Belsey James, Hoffmann Alexander, Seil Romain, van Heerwaarden Ronald, Pape Dietrich

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to assess the mechanical static and fatigue strength provided by the FlexitSystem plate in medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomies (MOWHTO), and to compare it to six previously tested implants: the TomoFix small stature, the TomoFix standard, the ContourLock, the iBalance, the second generation PEEKPower and the size 2 Activmotion. Thus, this will provide surgeons with data that will help in the choice of the most appropriate implant for MOWHTO.

METHODS

Six fourth-generation tibial bone composites underwent a MOWHTO and each was fixed using six FlexitSystem plates, according to standard techniques. The same testing procedure that has already been previously defined, used and published, was used to investigate the static and dynamic strength of the prepared bone-implant constructs. The test consisted of static loading and cyclical loading for fatigue testing.

RESULTS

During static testing, the group constituted by the FlexitSystem showed a fracture load higher than the physiological loading of slow walking (3.7 kN > 2.4 kN). Although this fracture load was relatively small compared to the average values for the other Implants from our previous studies, except for the TomoFix small stature and the Contour Lock. During fatigue testing, FlexitSystem group showed the smallest stiffness and higher lifespan than the TomoFix and the PEEKPower groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The FlexitSystem plate showed sufficient strength for static loading, and average fatigue strength compared to the previously tested implants. Full body dynamic loading of the tibia after MOWHTO with the investigated implants should be avoided for at least 3 weeks. Implants with a wider T-shaped proximal end, positioned onto the antero-medial side of the tibia head, or inserted in the osteotomy opening in a closed-wedge construction, provided higher mechanical strength than implants with small a T-shaped proximal end, centred onto the medial side of the tibia head.

Для цитирования: Diffo Kaze Arnaud, Maas Stefan, Belsey James, Hoffmann Alexander, Seil Romain, van Heerwaarden Ronald, Pape Dietrich. Mechanical strength of a new plate compared to six previously tested opening wedge high tibial osteotomy implants.. Journal of experimental orthopaedics. 2019. DOI: 10.1186/s40634-019-0209-1.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.