MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2006.00210.x

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of forensic sciences · 2006

Frequencies of morphological characteristics in two contemporary forensic collections: implications for identification.

Komar Debra, Lathrop Sarah

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Positive identification relies on comparison of antemortem and postmortem data. Some identifications are based on morphological features such as fracture, pathological condition, and surgical hardware, despite little literature indicating the frequencies of such traits. This study examines whether such features are sufficiently rare as to be deemed individualizing. Data were collected on two modern North American skeletal collections (N=482 individuals). Presence/absence of features was scored by skeletal element and side. Results indicate that frequencies vary by geographic region (higher frequency of fractures and pathological conditions in New Mexico while individuals in Tennessee were more likely to have surgical interventions), many features such as fractures are remarkably common and that even suites of traits may not be individualizing. Caution is warranted when using written data rather than radiographic comparisons as the primary source of identification. The implications of these findings to missing person databases are also discussed.

Для цитирования: Komar Debra, Lathrop Sarah. Frequencies of morphological characteristics in two contemporary forensic collections: implications for identification.. Journal of forensic sciences. 2006. DOI: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2006.00210.x.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.