BMC neurology · 2004
Effects of age and leg length upon central loop of the gastrocnemius-soleus H-reflex latency.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Sadeghi Shahram, Ghavanini Mohammadrezaalavian, Ashraf Alireza, Jafari Peyman
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: central loop of the gastrocnemius-soleus H-reflex latency (Tc) that looks promising in the diagnosis of S1 radiculopathy; has been investigated in a few studies and only two of them have focused on the constitutional factors affecting it. Although leg length has been shown to contribute to the Tc, the role of age is controversial. More confusing, none of the previously performed studies have used strict criteria to rule out subclinical neuropathy, so the results could be misleading. This study has been performed to determine the influence of leg length and age on Tc among a carefully selected group of healthy volunteers.
METHODS: after screening forty six volunteers by taking history, physical examination and a brief electrophysiologic study; forty of them were selected to enroll into the study. Tc was obtained in all the study subjects and leg length and age were recorded for correlational analyses.
RESULTS: this group was consisted of 26 males (65%) and 14 females (35%) with the age range of 19-65 years (Mean +/- SD: 37 +/- 10.7) and leg length range of 29.5-43 centimeters (36.4 +/- 3.4). Mean +/- SD for Tc was 6.78 +/- 0.3. We found a significant correlation between Tc and leg length (p value= 0.003, r = 0.49 and confidence interval 95% = 0.59-0.88), no significant correlation was found between age and Tc (p value= 0.48, r = 0.11), also we obtained the regression equation as: Tc = 0.04L + 5.28
CONCLUSIONS: in contrast to leg length, age was not correlated with Tc. Future studies are required to delineate other contributing factors to Tc.
METHODS: after screening forty six volunteers by taking history, physical examination and a brief electrophysiologic study; forty of them were selected to enroll into the study. Tc was obtained in all the study subjects and leg length and age were recorded for correlational analyses.
RESULTS: this group was consisted of 26 males (65%) and 14 females (35%) with the age range of 19-65 years (Mean +/- SD: 37 +/- 10.7) and leg length range of 29.5-43 centimeters (36.4 +/- 3.4). Mean +/- SD for Tc was 6.78 +/- 0.3. We found a significant correlation between Tc and leg length (p value= 0.003, r = 0.49 and confidence interval 95% = 0.59-0.88), no significant correlation was found between age and Tc (p value= 0.48, r = 0.11), also we obtained the regression equation as: Tc = 0.04L + 5.28
CONCLUSIONS: in contrast to leg length, age was not correlated with Tc. Future studies are required to delineate other contributing factors to Tc.