Детерминанты провала клинических испытаний в множестве склерозов: исследования от клинических экспертов.gov.
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Rivero-de-Aguilar Alejandro, Pérez-Ríos Mónica, Ross Joseph S, Mascareñas-García Marta, Ruano-Raviña Alberto, Varela-Lema Leonor
Аннотация
Оригинал публикации
Determinants of clinical trial failure in multiple sclerosis: insights from ClinicalTrials.gov.
BACKGROUND: Clinical trial failure -when a study is withdrawn or terminated for reasons unrelated to safety or efficacy-wastes resources and exposes patients to unnecessary risks. We examined such failures in the field of multiple sclerosis (MS).
METHODS: We searched ClinicalTrials.gov for phase III and IV MS drug trials conducted in 2008-2024. Trials were classified as normally ended or failed based on recruitment status and reported reasons. When information was missing, we reviewed publications and contacted principal investigators (PIs). Kaplan-Meier method was used to assess time to trial end and multivariate logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with failure.
RESULTS: The 282 clinical trials included in our analysis involved 62 experimental drugs, primarily disease-modifying therapies (n = 213 trials). Most studies aimed to evaluate drug efficacy (n = 196 trials). Overall, 74.8% trials ended normally while 25.2% failed. On average, failed trials ended ten months earlier that the rest of studies (trial actual duration: 17.8 vs. 28.2 months, p < 0.001). Main reasons for failure were low recruitment (28.2%), unspecified business decisions (26.8%) and logistical problems (12.7%). In 28.2% of occasions it remained undisclosed. Trials evaluating drug safety (OR 0.35, 95%CI 0.13-0.94) and those with ≥ 50 centres (OR 0.10, 95%CI 0.02-0.38) failed less often. Failure was not associated with other factors such as study start date, PI location or industry involvement.
CONCLUSIONS: One out of four MS clinical trials fails. Increasing the number of study sites and improving recruitment strategies could enhance their success rates.