Hand therapy · 2023
Validity, reliability and responsiveness of a goniometer watch to measure pure forearm rotation.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Harte Daniel, Nevill Alan, Ramsey Lucia, Martin Suzanne
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Innovative instruments have been designed to assess forearm rotation, an anatomically challenging motion to measure. This study assessed the concurrent validity, interrater reliability and responsiveness of a novel goniometer watch (GoWatch) to measure pure forearm rotation. The modified finger goniometer (MFG) was the criterion reference.
METHODS: Forty participants with restricted forearm rotation were recruited. Two raters measured supination and pronation using the GoWatch and MFG before and after a hand therapy session. Repeated-measures ANOVA assessed for systematic bias with an apriori residual error of 5° deemed as acceptable. Secondary analysis used intraclass coefficients (ICCs) to categorise interrater reliability. Responsiveness of the GoWatch was calculated using Cohen's d.
RESULTS: The GoWatch demonstrated acceptable agreement with the MFG with a mean difference for supination 1.19° and pronation 0.20°. Interrater reliability was also within acceptable limits with a mean difference GoWatch supination 4.43° and pronation 2.23°. Interrater reliability for GoWatch supination and pronation were categorized as excellent (ICC = 0.94) and good (ICC = 0.85) respectively. Systematic bias was observed in the instrument by rater interaction with rater two consistently underestimating GoWatch measures (p<.05). GoWatch supination showed small to medium responsiveness (Rater 1: d = 0.14; Rater 2: d = 0.29) and pronation very small to medium responsiveness (Rater 1: d = 0.29; Rater 2: d = 0.05).
CONCLUSION: The GoWatch is a viable and user-friendly alternative to measure forearm rotation with demonstrable validity, interrater reliability and responsiveness. Further research is required to ensure systematic bias is not endemic when used across multiple raters.
METHODS: Forty participants with restricted forearm rotation were recruited. Two raters measured supination and pronation using the GoWatch and MFG before and after a hand therapy session. Repeated-measures ANOVA assessed for systematic bias with an apriori residual error of 5° deemed as acceptable. Secondary analysis used intraclass coefficients (ICCs) to categorise interrater reliability. Responsiveness of the GoWatch was calculated using Cohen's d.
RESULTS: The GoWatch demonstrated acceptable agreement with the MFG with a mean difference for supination 1.19° and pronation 0.20°. Interrater reliability was also within acceptable limits with a mean difference GoWatch supination 4.43° and pronation 2.23°. Interrater reliability for GoWatch supination and pronation were categorized as excellent (ICC = 0.94) and good (ICC = 0.85) respectively. Systematic bias was observed in the instrument by rater interaction with rater two consistently underestimating GoWatch measures (p<.05). GoWatch supination showed small to medium responsiveness (Rater 1: d = 0.14; Rater 2: d = 0.29) and pronation very small to medium responsiveness (Rater 1: d = 0.29; Rater 2: d = 0.05).
CONCLUSION: The GoWatch is a viable and user-friendly alternative to measure forearm rotation with demonstrable validity, interrater reliability and responsiveness. Further research is required to ensure systematic bias is not endemic when used across multiple raters.