Spine deformity · 2022
Rapid recovery pathway without epidural catheter analgesia for surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a comparative study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Colón Luis Felipe, Powell Charles, Wilson Andrew, Burgan Taylor, Quigley Robert
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To assess effectiveness of a rapid recovery pathway (RRP) without epidural catheter analgesia (ECA) or intravenous patient controlled analgesia (PCA) in accelerating recovery and decreasing opioid consumption in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) undergoing posterior spinal fusion (PSF).
METHODS: A retrospective cohort study included collection of demographics, ECA use, IV PCA, postoperative opioid consumption, postoperative pain scores, and reoperation rate. Opioid consumption was calculated using morphine milligram equivalents (MME). Hospital length of stay (HLOS) and first reported ambulation with physical therapy (PT) were also recorded.
RESULTS: 53 patients were included, with 18 in the RRP group. Patient characteristics were comparable between the groups, except in ECA use and BMI. The RRP group consumed less total MME from postoperative day (POD) 0 to 2 (mean difference 61.6 MME; 95% CI 37.1-86.1 MME; p < 0.001). In addition, the RRP group had significantly shorter HLOS (2.5 vs 4.0 days; p < 0.001). There were no differences in VAS scores between the two groups. A subset analysis comparing patients who did and did not receive ECA showed that ECA resulted in overall higher inpatient MME and HLOS. A prediction model was developed using multiple regression based on the different medications used for multimodal analgesia (MMA) in the RRP.
CONCLUSIONS: An RRP without the use of ECA or IV PCA can provide adequate analgesia in patients with AIS undergoing PSF while lowering inpatient narcotic consumption and accelerating immediate postoperative recovery.
METHODS: A retrospective cohort study included collection of demographics, ECA use, IV PCA, postoperative opioid consumption, postoperative pain scores, and reoperation rate. Opioid consumption was calculated using morphine milligram equivalents (MME). Hospital length of stay (HLOS) and first reported ambulation with physical therapy (PT) were also recorded.
RESULTS: 53 patients were included, with 18 in the RRP group. Patient characteristics were comparable between the groups, except in ECA use and BMI. The RRP group consumed less total MME from postoperative day (POD) 0 to 2 (mean difference 61.6 MME; 95% CI 37.1-86.1 MME; p < 0.001). In addition, the RRP group had significantly shorter HLOS (2.5 vs 4.0 days; p < 0.001). There were no differences in VAS scores between the two groups. A subset analysis comparing patients who did and did not receive ECA showed that ECA resulted in overall higher inpatient MME and HLOS. A prediction model was developed using multiple regression based on the different medications used for multimodal analgesia (MMA) in the RRP.
CONCLUSIONS: An RRP without the use of ECA or IV PCA can provide adequate analgesia in patients with AIS undergoing PSF while lowering inpatient narcotic consumption and accelerating immediate postoperative recovery.