MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.2147/ppa.s449265

Медицинская библиотека · Patient preference and adherence · 2024

Validation of the Arabic Version of the Attitude Toward Education and Advice for Low Back Pain Questionnaire.

Alhowimel Ahmed S, Ogbeivor Collins, Alruwaili Ahmad Dalli, Morizn Omar M, Aljamaan Abdulaziz, Alenazi Aqeel M, Alhwoaimel Norah A, Alshehri Mohammed M, Alqahtani Bader A, Alodaibi Faris A

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE: This cross-sectional study aimed to validate the Arabic version of the Attitude toward Education and Advice for Low Back Pain (AxEL) Questionnaire.

PATIENTS AND

METHODS

This study was conducted in two phases. First, the AxEL questionnaire was translated into Arabic and cross-culturally adapted. Second, the psychometric properties (such as validity) of the translated AxEL were evaluated.

RESULTS

The results showed that back translators and language specialists had no trouble translating the AxEL. The translators' agreement was very high (88.2%), and the questionnaire items were logically and clearly translated from English into Arabic.

CONCLUSION

The Arabic version of AxEL is a valid tool that can assess individuals' beliefs and attitudes towards low back pain (LBP). It fills a significant void in cross-cultural research and can help healthcare providers understand the attitudes and beliefs influencing individuals' management of LBP within the Arabic context.

Для цитирования: Alhowimel Ahmed S, Ogbeivor Collins, Alruwaili Ahmad Dalli, Morizn Omar M, Aljamaan Abdulaziz, Alenazi Aqeel M, Alhwoaimel Norah A, Alshehri Mohammed M, Alqahtani Bader A, Alodaibi Faris A. Validation of the Arabic Version of the Attitude Toward Education and Advice for Low Back Pain Questionnaire.. Patient preference and adherence. 2024. DOI: 10.2147/ppa.s449265.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.