The American journal of medicine · 2005
A rational approach to evidence gaps in the management of osteoporosis.
СтатьяОбзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Rosen Clifford J, Brown Sue A
Аннотация
Major advancements in the treatment of osteoporosis have occurred over the last decade. Therapies including the anti-resorptive drugs such as alendronate and risedronate have been shown in randomized placebo-controlled trials to increase bone mineral density and reduce fracture risk. Anabolic therapy in the form of parathyroid hormone has been introduced as the first treatment to build bone mass. However, gaps in our knowledge about specific management issues that arise frequently among primary care providers persist. In this paper, three common clinical scenarios are discussed: a postmenopausal woman with only slightly reduced bone mineral density; an osteoporotic woman on anti-resorptive therapy for more than 5 years; and a woman who continues to fracture despite treatment. Evidence gaps in each treatment scenario are presented, and rational approaches to management are suggested.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Age FactorsAgedAnimalsBone DensityBone Density Conservation AgentsBone Diseases, MetabolicBone ResorptionCase ManagementCohort StudiesDiphosphonatesDrug Therapy, CombinationEstrogensEvidence-Based MedicineFemaleFollow-Up StudiesFractures, SpontaneousHealth SurveysHip FracturesHumansIncidenceMiddle AgedOsteoporosis, PostmenopausalParathyroid HormoneRaloxifene HydrochlorideRatsRisk AssessmentSpinal FracturesTime Factors