European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2025
Automated extraction of vertebral bone mineral density from imaging with various scan parameters: a cadaver study with correlation to quantitative computed tomography.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ramschütz Constanze, Kloth Christopher, Vogele Daniel, Baum Thomas, Rühling Sebastian, Beer Meinrad, Jansen Jan U, Schlager Benedikt, Wilke Hans-Joachim, Kirschke Jan S, Sollmann Nico
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To investigate lumbar vertebral volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) from ex vivo opportunistic multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) scans using different protocols, and compare it to dedicated quantitative CT (QCT) values from the same specimens.
METHODS: Cadavers from two female donors (ages 62 and 68 years) were scanned (L1-L5) using six different MDCT protocols and one dedicated QCT scan. Opportunistic vBMD was extracted using an artificial intelligence-based algorithm. The vBMD measurements from the six MDCT protocols, which varied in peak tube voltage (80-140 kVp), tube load (72-200 mAs), slice thickness (0.75-1 mm), and/or slice increment (0.5-0.75 mm), were compared to those obtained from dedicated QCT.
RESULTS: A strong positive correlation was observed between vBMD from opportunistic MDCT and reference QCT (ρ = 0.869, p < 0.01). Agreement between vBMD measurements from MDCT protocols and the QCT reference standard according to the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was 0.992 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.982-0.998). Bland-Altman analysis showed biases ranging from - 12.66 to 8.00 mg/cm³ across the six MDCT protocols, with all data points falling within the respective limits of agreement (LOA) for both cadavers.
CONCLUSION: Opportunistic vBMD measurements of lumbar vertebrae demonstrated reliable consistency ex vivo across various scan parameters when compared to dedicated QCT.
METHODS: Cadavers from two female donors (ages 62 and 68 years) were scanned (L1-L5) using six different MDCT protocols and one dedicated QCT scan. Opportunistic vBMD was extracted using an artificial intelligence-based algorithm. The vBMD measurements from the six MDCT protocols, which varied in peak tube voltage (80-140 kVp), tube load (72-200 mAs), slice thickness (0.75-1 mm), and/or slice increment (0.5-0.75 mm), were compared to those obtained from dedicated QCT.
RESULTS: A strong positive correlation was observed between vBMD from opportunistic MDCT and reference QCT (ρ = 0.869, p < 0.01). Agreement between vBMD measurements from MDCT protocols and the QCT reference standard according to the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was 0.992 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.982-0.998). Bland-Altman analysis showed biases ranging from - 12.66 to 8.00 mg/cm³ across the six MDCT protocols, with all data points falling within the respective limits of agreement (LOA) for both cadavers.
CONCLUSION: Opportunistic vBMD measurements of lumbar vertebrae demonstrated reliable consistency ex vivo across various scan parameters when compared to dedicated QCT.