MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/21925682221124100

Медицинская библиотека · Global spine journal · 2022

Global Validation of the AO Spine Upper Cervical Injury Classification: Geographic Region Affects Reliability and Reproducibility.

Lambrechts Mark J, Schroeder Gregory D, Karamian Brian A, Canseco Jose A, Bransford Richard, Oner Cumhur, Benneker Lorin M, Kandziora Frank, Shanmuganathan Rajasekaran, Kanna Rishi, Joaquim Andrei F, Chapman Jens R, Vialle Emiliano, El-Sharkawi Mohammad, Dvorak Marcel, Schnake Klaus, Kepler Christopher K, Vaccaro Alexander R, AO Spine Upper Cervical Injury Classification International Members

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

STUDY

DESIGN

Global Survey.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the accuracy, interobserver reliability, and intraobserver reproducibility of the AO Spine Upper Cervical Injury Classification System based on surgeons' AO Spine region of practice (Africa, Asia, Central/South America, Europe, Middle East, and North America).

METHODS

A total of 275 AO Spine members assessed 25 upper cervical spine injuries and classified them according to the AO Spine Upper Cervical Injury Classification System. Reliability, reproducibility, and accuracy scores were obtained over two assessments administered at three-week intervals. Kappa coefficients (ƙ) determined the interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility.

RESULTS

On both assessments, participants from Europe and North America had the highest classification accuracy, while participants from Africa and Central/South America had the lowest accuracy (P < .0001). Participants from Africa (assessment 1 (AS1):ƙ = .487; AS2:0.491), Central/South America (AS1:ƙ = .513; AS2:0.511), and the Middle East (AS1:0.591; AS2: .599) achieved moderate reliability, while participants from North America (AS1:ƙ = .673; AS2:0.648) and Europe (AS1:ƙ = .682; AS2:0.681) achieved substantial reliability. Asian participants obtained substantial reliability on AS1 (ƙ = .632), but moderate reliability on AS2 (ƙ = .566). Although there was a large effect size, the low number of participants in certain regions did not provide adequate certainty that AO regions affected the likelihood of participants having excellent reproducibility (P = .342).

CONCLUSIONS

The AO Spine Upper Cervical Injury Classification System can be applied with high accuracy, interobserver reliability, and intraobserver reproducibility. However, lower classification accuracy and reliability were found in regions of Africa and Central/South America, especially for severe atlas injuries (IIB and IIC) and atypical hangman's type fractures (IIIB injuries).

Для цитирования: Lambrechts Mark J, Schroeder Gregory D, Karamian Brian A, Canseco Jose A, Bransford Richard, Oner Cumhur, Benneker Lorin M, Kandziora Frank, Shanmuganathan Rajasekaran, Kanna Rishi, Joaquim Andrei F, Chapman Jens R, Vialle Emiliano, El-Sharkawi Mohammad, Dvorak Marcel, Schnake Klaus, Kepler Christopher K, Vaccaro Alexander R, AO Spine Upper Cervical Injury Classification International Members. Global Validation of the AO Spine Upper Cervical Injury Classification: Geographic Region Affects Reliability and Reproducibility.. Global spine journal. 2022. DOI: 10.1177/21925682221124100.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.