Minerva dental and oral science · 2023
Biologically-oriented Alveolar Ridge Preservation.
Клинический случайСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Pramstraller Mattia, Simonelli Anna, Farina Roberto, Trombelli Leonardo
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: A recent systematic review failed to identify one approach for alveolar ridge preservation with superior outcomes. The present case series aimed to evaluate the dimensional changes of sites undergoing Biologically-oriented Alveolar Ridge Preservation (BARP).
METHODS: The sockets were filled with a collagen sponge up to 4-5 mm from the most coronal extensions of the crest. Xenograft particles were placed to fill the coronal part. In cases with a compromised buccal/lingual bone, an additional collagen sponge was interposed between the residual cortical bone plate and the mucoperiosteal flap. A collagen sponge was placed to cover the graft.
RESULTS: The study population consisted in 10 extraction sites. Mean change in bone width and vertical ridge position as observed from BARP to re-entry for implant placement were 1.3 mm (14.4%) and 0.6 mm, respectively. The mean distance between buccal and lingual flap healing by secondary intention shifted from 4.9 mm immediately after BARP to 1.8 mm at 2 weeks. No marked differences in the dimensional changes of alveolar ridge were observed between sites with intact or deficient buccal bone plate. All implants were successfully loaded at 2-3 months after placement. In one case, bone augmentation was required.
CONCLUSIONS: The stratification of materials proposed in BARP-technique and the additional use of a resorbable device to stabilize graft particles at the buccal aspect provided the conditions for maintaining the ridge dimensions following tooth extraction comparable to the other technique of ARP, restricting the use of graft material to the most coronal portion of the socket.
METHODS: The sockets were filled with a collagen sponge up to 4-5 mm from the most coronal extensions of the crest. Xenograft particles were placed to fill the coronal part. In cases with a compromised buccal/lingual bone, an additional collagen sponge was interposed between the residual cortical bone plate and the mucoperiosteal flap. A collagen sponge was placed to cover the graft.
RESULTS: The study population consisted in 10 extraction sites. Mean change in bone width and vertical ridge position as observed from BARP to re-entry for implant placement were 1.3 mm (14.4%) and 0.6 mm, respectively. The mean distance between buccal and lingual flap healing by secondary intention shifted from 4.9 mm immediately after BARP to 1.8 mm at 2 weeks. No marked differences in the dimensional changes of alveolar ridge were observed between sites with intact or deficient buccal bone plate. All implants were successfully loaded at 2-3 months after placement. In one case, bone augmentation was required.
CONCLUSIONS: The stratification of materials proposed in BARP-technique and the additional use of a resorbable device to stabilize graft particles at the buccal aspect provided the conditions for maintaining the ridge dimensions following tooth extraction comparable to the other technique of ARP, restricting the use of graft material to the most coronal portion of the socket.