DOI 10.1097/md.0000000000021755
A screw view model of navigation guided minimal invasive percutaneous pelvic screws insertion for lateral compression pelvic ring injuries: A case report.
Аннотация
RATIONALE: The objective of the present study was to evaluate the accuracy, effectiveness, and safety of screw view model of navigation (SVMN) guided minimal invasive percutaneous pelvic screws (PPSs) insertion for lateral compression pelvic ring injuries (PRI).
PATIENT CONCERNS: A female patient experienced a high falling injury, and presented with pain, swelling, deformity, and movement limitation of the left hip for 3 hours.
DIAGNOSES: She was diagnosed with pelvic fractures, left iliac fracture, left pubic branch fracture, left ischial branch fracture, and lumbar transverse process fracture.
INTERVENTIONS: We used a SVMN technique to guide PPSs insertion, including a percutaneous anterior inferior iliac spine screw, a percutaneous iliac screw (PIS), and a percutaneous sacroiliac screw (PSIS).
OUTCOMES: In total, 3 PPSs were inserted and all were presented with excellent position postoperatively. The designing time of all screws was 11.7 minutes, the time of all guide needles insertion was 18.1 minutes, the time of all screws insertion was 32.8 minutes, blood loss was 21 mL, and the time of radiation exposure lasted 7.2 minutes. Moreover, surgical complications, including neurovascular compromise, wound infection, fracture nonunion, and screw loosening, were not observed during the 12 months follow up visit.
LESSONS: SVMN technique guided PPSs insertion is an effective and safety approach for the treatment of PRI in selected patients. Besides, it is necessary for surgeons to master the rationale of computer navigation, to familiar with the anatomy of pelvis and to select suitable patients.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.