Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2007
Influence of calcium channel blocker drugs in neuromuscular transmission.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ozkul Yasar
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Calcium channel blockers are commonly used in some cardiovascular disorders. These drugs can act at neuromuscular transmission, at both pre- and postsynaptic levels and may produce neuromuscular dysfunction. Therefore, they may result in misdiagnosis in electrophysiological testing of healthy subjects. This study aimed to investigate the influence of calcium channel blockers on neuromuscular transmission, using single fiber electromyography, in subjects who were healthy excepting controlled arterial hypertension condition.
METHODS: Single fiber electromyography during voluntary contraction of the extensor digitorum communis muscle, nerve conduction studies of upper and lower extremities, and concentric needle electromyography of the extensor digitorum communis were performed on 16 verapamil users, 16 amlodipine users, and 16 age-matched normal controls. Twenty potential pairs were recorded from each subject. Twenty individual jitter values and a mean jitter value were calculated for each subject. Both mean jitter values and numbers of abnormal individual jitter values were compared in verapamil and amlodipine users versus normal controls.
RESULTS: Eight of 16 verapamil users and 7 of amlodipine users showed evident neuromuscular transmission abnormalities by single fiber electromyography. Two subjects from verapamil and one subjects from amlodipine users group had borderline dysfunction of neuromuscular transmission.
CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that both verapamil and amlodipine impair neuromuscular transmission in subjects without neuromuscular disease.
SIGNIFICANCE: The effects of verapamil and amlodipine are at a level, which may cause misinterpretation of single fiber electromyography studies carried out to investigate neuromuscular junction disorders.
METHODS: Single fiber electromyography during voluntary contraction of the extensor digitorum communis muscle, nerve conduction studies of upper and lower extremities, and concentric needle electromyography of the extensor digitorum communis were performed on 16 verapamil users, 16 amlodipine users, and 16 age-matched normal controls. Twenty potential pairs were recorded from each subject. Twenty individual jitter values and a mean jitter value were calculated for each subject. Both mean jitter values and numbers of abnormal individual jitter values were compared in verapamil and amlodipine users versus normal controls.
RESULTS: Eight of 16 verapamil users and 7 of amlodipine users showed evident neuromuscular transmission abnormalities by single fiber electromyography. Two subjects from verapamil and one subjects from amlodipine users group had borderline dysfunction of neuromuscular transmission.
CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that both verapamil and amlodipine impair neuromuscular transmission in subjects without neuromuscular disease.
SIGNIFICANCE: The effects of verapamil and amlodipine are at a level, which may cause misinterpretation of single fiber electromyography studies carried out to investigate neuromuscular junction disorders.