Modern rheumatology · 2017
An evaluation of two novel capillaroscopy techniques in suspected scleroderma-spectrum disorders: A single-centre cross-sectional study.
Оценочное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Parker Matthew J S, Oliffe Michael T, McGill Neil W
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: The primary aim was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of digital photographs taken with a smartphone camera using both a lens attachment and, separately, a dermatoscope. The secondary aims were to assess the influence of prior capillaroscopy experience and familiarity with the novel techniques on diagnostic accuracy.
METHODS: All patients referred for capillaroscopy between May 2016 and January 2017 were eligible for inclusion. Nailfolds were classified by widefield microscopy before proceeding double-blinded to nailfold photography using both novel techniques. Randomised photographs were assessed by three independent investigators and results were compared to widefield microscopy. Sensitivity, specificity, inter- and intra-observer variability were calculated.
RESULTS: Sixty-five participants contributed over 1000 digital photographs for assessment. The 'smartphone-lens' technique performed with moderate sensitivity (65%; 58-72) and high specificity (90%; 84-96). The 'smartphone-dermatoscope' technique performed with higher sensitivity (74%; 66-82) and excellent specificity (95%; 88-100) and was used more accurately by a novice. Prior assessor experience with nailfold capillaroscopy in general and prior experience with the novel techniques positively modulated the diagnostic accuracy.
CONCLUSION: New technologies, in this case utilising a smartphone camera, could help to improve accessibility to nailfold capillaroscopy, an important diagnostic tool and putative biomarker in scleroderma-spectrum disorders, whilst retaining accurate results.
METHODS: All patients referred for capillaroscopy between May 2016 and January 2017 were eligible for inclusion. Nailfolds were classified by widefield microscopy before proceeding double-blinded to nailfold photography using both novel techniques. Randomised photographs were assessed by three independent investigators and results were compared to widefield microscopy. Sensitivity, specificity, inter- and intra-observer variability were calculated.
RESULTS: Sixty-five participants contributed over 1000 digital photographs for assessment. The 'smartphone-lens' technique performed with moderate sensitivity (65%; 58-72) and high specificity (90%; 84-96). The 'smartphone-dermatoscope' technique performed with higher sensitivity (74%; 66-82) and excellent specificity (95%; 88-100) and was used more accurately by a novice. Prior assessor experience with nailfold capillaroscopy in general and prior experience with the novel techniques positively modulated the diagnostic accuracy.
CONCLUSION: New technologies, in this case utilising a smartphone camera, could help to improve accessibility to nailfold capillaroscopy, an important diagnostic tool and putative biomarker in scleroderma-spectrum disorders, whilst retaining accurate results.